<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Differences Between Meta NoIndex, NoFollow and Robots.txt File</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoboy.com/the-differences-between-noindex-nofollow-and-robotstxt-file/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoboy.com/the-differences-between-noindex-nofollow-and-robotstxt-file/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Articles</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/the-differences-between-noindex-nofollow-and-robotstxt-file/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=994#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>So if you add a robots.txt file with certain pages, those pages may still pass page rank?  Is there a way to block the flow of page rank using the robots.txt file by itself?

Thanks for a helpful post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if you add a robots.txt file with certain pages, those pages may still pass page rank?  Is there a way to block the flow of page rank using the robots.txt file by itself?</p>
<p>Thanks for a helpful post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faiza</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/the-differences-between-noindex-nofollow-and-robotstxt-file/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Faiza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=994#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Hi Amber,

I just realised something while I was tweeting this post. You don&#039;t have social bookmarking buttons except for Sphinn. I bet you are missing a great deal on that!

Cheers.
http://twitter.com/faizali</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amber,</p>
<p>I just realised something while I was tweeting this post. You don&#8217;t have social bookmarking buttons except for Sphinn. I bet you are missing a great deal on that!</p>
<p>Cheers.<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/faizali" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/faizali</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/the-differences-between-noindex-nofollow-and-robotstxt-file/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=994#comment-684</guid>
		<description>@Faiza, you are correct, if you use a NoFollow and NoIndex either together or separately, the pages can still be crawled - I&#039;ll fix this in my post, thanks for catching that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Faiza, you are correct, if you use a NoFollow and NoIndex either together or separately, the pages can still be crawled &#8211; I&#8217;ll fix this in my post, thanks for catching that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faiza</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/the-differences-between-noindex-nofollow-and-robotstxt-file/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Faiza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=994#comment-682</guid>
		<description>I would like a clarification from the below point you mentioned: 

&quot;Most people use the NoFollow and the NoIndex tags together so that a page like a shopping cart page that is dynamically driven isn’t crawled, indexed or assigned any PageRank.&quot;

NoFollow and NoIndex doesn&#039;t hinder crawling...right? Then how did you say that both used in conjunction prevents the page from being crawled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like a clarification from the below point you mentioned: </p>
<p>&#8220;Most people use the NoFollow and the NoIndex tags together so that a page like a shopping cart page that is dynamically driven isn’t crawled, indexed or assigned any PageRank.&#8221;</p>
<p>NoFollow and NoIndex doesn&#8217;t hinder crawling&#8230;right? Then how did you say that both used in conjunction prevents the page from being crawled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
