<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No love for Local SEO from Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoboy.com/no-love-for-local-seo-from-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoboy.com/no-love-for-local-seo-from-apple/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/no-love-for-local-seo-from-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=3764#comment-3618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good little post. Interesting thought. I had never even noticed the lack of google places results either. However when searching by phone the results tend to be based on your GPS position. So yeah local SEO will still be a big part of the results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good little post. Interesting thought. I had never even noticed the lack of google places results either. However when searching by phone the results tend to be based on your GPS position. So yeah local SEO will still be a big part of the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
