<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Need Another Reason to Use XML Sitemaps? Compare Index Stats in Google Webmaster Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoboy.com/need-another-reason-to-use-xml-sitemaps-compare-index-stats-in-google-webmaster-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoboy.com/need-another-reason-to-use-xml-sitemaps-compare-index-stats-in-google-webmaster-tools/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/need-another-reason-to-use-xml-sitemaps-compare-index-stats-in-google-webmaster-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=561#comment-3964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@both =)

While I have a site with 40k pages and 40 sitemaps files with 1k urls each (1 line, 1 url) and getting 50% index ratio and basically having the same situation as Rob when I had 1 sitemap file - I&#039;m still wondering how I could get more like 100% - The customer should have the possibility of finding the right page...
The site is very much so an ecosystem in its own right and thus ever changing.
Using more (and ever more) sitemaps solved - rather helped - the 8000/30000 index ratio situation... buuuut, it&#039;s a little lame... even if it works, its a lot of extra work.
I&#039;m pretty sure internal linking could not really be the &quot;baddy&quot; here - &#039;cause all pages are linked to from the top and all pages links to all pages in the same group through &quot;list views&quot; of those groups - as I&#039;m sure Robs dynamic 30k pages site is too in some way or another... Rob? What site are you referring to?
I would probably never use the XML solution, as I too is in great need of another reason.. =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@both =)</p>
<p>While I have a site with 40k pages and 40 sitemaps files with 1k urls each (1 line, 1 url) and getting 50% index ratio and basically having the same situation as Rob when I had 1 sitemap file &#8211; I&#8217;m still wondering how I could get more like 100% &#8211; The customer should have the possibility of finding the right page&#8230;<br />
The site is very much so an ecosystem in its own right and thus ever changing.<br />
Using more (and ever more) sitemaps solved &#8211; rather helped &#8211; the 8000/30000 index ratio situation&#8230; buuuut, it&#8217;s a little lame&#8230; even if it works, its a lot of extra work.<br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure internal linking could not really be the &#8220;baddy&#8221; here &#8211; &#8217;cause all pages are linked to from the top and all pages links to all pages in the same group through &#8220;list views&#8221; of those groups &#8211; as I&#8217;m sure Robs dynamic 30k pages site is too in some way or another&#8230; Rob? What site are you referring to?<br />
I would probably never use the XML solution, as I too is in great need of another reason.. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/need-another-reason-to-use-xml-sitemaps-compare-index-stats-in-google-webmaster-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=561#comment-506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Rob,

Not 100% sure what you&#039;re agreeing/disagreeing with.  I was merely pointing out that by submitting an XML Sitemap to Google, you could view the ratio of pages listed in your sitemap to those actual indexed (as reported by Google).  

It may very well be possible that your 30K page site only has 8000 indexed.  While I&#039;m a proponent of using and submitting sitemaps, I&#039;ve never been one to naively believe that it&#039;s a ticket to 100% indexation!  You still have to work on the fundamentals of internal linking and site structure to ensure that Google, and the rest of the search engines, can find your content and index/rank it appropriately!

Thanks for commenting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rob,</p>
<p>Not 100% sure what you&#8217;re agreeing/disagreeing with.  I was merely pointing out that by submitting an XML Sitemap to Google, you could view the ratio of pages listed in your sitemap to those actual indexed (as reported by Google).  </p>
<p>It may very well be possible that your 30K page site only has 8000 indexed.  While I&#8217;m a proponent of using and submitting sitemaps, I&#8217;ve never been one to naively believe that it&#8217;s a ticket to 100% indexation!  You still have to work on the fundamentals of internal linking and site structure to ensure that Google, and the rest of the search engines, can find your content and index/rank it appropriately!</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/need-another-reason-to-use-xml-sitemaps-compare-index-stats-in-google-webmaster-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=561#comment-494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love your logo, and header, not sure about the post though. I have a few sites that would disagree. I have one that has over 30,000 pages in the sitemap, and only 8,000 are indexed. My slower sites (slower in growth) tend to agree with you though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your logo, and header, not sure about the post though. I have a few sites that would disagree. I have one that has over 30,000 pages in the sitemap, and only 8,000 are indexed. My slower sites (slower in growth) tend to agree with you though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
