<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Favorite SEO Argument: Sitemap vs. No Sitemap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=177#comment-718</guid>
		<description>@ Larry,

Thanks for commenting!  I like your way of thinking - anything worth doing is worth doing correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Larry,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!  I like your way of thinking &#8211; anything worth doing is worth doing correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=177#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Like with all development, the key is not the tools you use but how you use them.  Sitemaps are a great tool if you code properly.  If you do not follow good coding techniques then no tools will help you.

I hear the same argument about vb.net vs. c#.net.  I&#039;m proficient in both but I prefer vb as it&#039;s easier to work with and actually I find it LESS verbose than c#, contrary to the literature out there.  The arguments against vb amount to the fact that it&#039;s easier to code poorly.  So, don&#039;t code poorly!

I always find my rankings go up after resubmitting my sitemap.  I know my sitemap is not the only reason I get consistently high hits however.  It&#039;s just a matter of doing everything correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like with all development, the key is not the tools you use but how you use them.  Sitemaps are a great tool if you code properly.  If you do not follow good coding techniques then no tools will help you.</p>
<p>I hear the same argument about vb.net vs. c#.net.  I&#8217;m proficient in both but I prefer vb as it&#8217;s easier to work with and actually I find it LESS verbose than c#, contrary to the literature out there.  The arguments against vb amount to the fact that it&#8217;s easier to code poorly.  So, don&#8217;t code poorly!</p>
<p>I always find my rankings go up after resubmitting my sitemap.  I know my sitemap is not the only reason I get consistently high hits however.  It&#8217;s just a matter of doing everything correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
