<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Favorite SEO Argument: Sitemap vs. No Sitemap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/comment-page-1/#comment-5210</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=177#comment-5210</guid>
		<description>Very odd situation happened with 2 websites when i created 2 sitemaps for both websites. I have been an &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.computerz101.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; SEO&lt;/a&gt; person to never create a sitemap or use them period. Then I an itch and it said to create two xml sitemaps for 2 different websites. After uploading them to there website directory that was in correlation with the sitemap I then went into Google WebMaster Tools and added the sitemaps for both websites. Less than 2 days later very highly ranked keywords literally dropped from page 1 with over 30 keywords being on page 1 of google to page 2, 3, 4, 29, etc i assume you get the picture. This was for both websites all the other websites I left alone and they are perfectly fine with never having used or implemented a sitemap so it leads to be believe from first hand experience that it&#039;s a bad idea to use an xml sitemap. Now I am sure that hundreds of people can argue back and forth about this and that is ok. I just think personally that I wont be utilizing an XML Sitemap again...this one change and only change has costed me hundreds of dollars losted over the past 3 days of my ranking dropping.

Now I can say that it did index more pages faster even though google would have gotten around to it within 3-7 days instead of 1 or 2, but to preserve my high ranking I am more than willing to wait.

I added the xml sitemap on January 2, 2012 and on January 4, 2012 page 1 many rankings/keywords disappeared by the 5th only dropped further back I have since deleted the sitemaps from the web dirs and removed them from google web master tools.  

To find out more you can go check this out..
&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.computerz101.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tucson Internet Marketing&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very odd situation happened with 2 websites when i created 2 sitemaps for both websites. I have been an <a HREF="http://www.computerz101.com/" rel="nofollow"> SEO</a> person to never create a sitemap or use them period. Then I an itch and it said to create two xml sitemaps for 2 different websites. After uploading them to there website directory that was in correlation with the sitemap I then went into Google WebMaster Tools and added the sitemaps for both websites. Less than 2 days later very highly ranked keywords literally dropped from page 1 with over 30 keywords being on page 1 of google to page 2, 3, 4, 29, etc i assume you get the picture. This was for both websites all the other websites I left alone and they are perfectly fine with never having used or implemented a sitemap so it leads to be believe from first hand experience that it&#8217;s a bad idea to use an xml sitemap. Now I am sure that hundreds of people can argue back and forth about this and that is ok. I just think personally that I wont be utilizing an XML Sitemap again&#8230;this one change and only change has costed me hundreds of dollars losted over the past 3 days of my ranking dropping.</p>
<p>Now I can say that it did index more pages faster even though google would have gotten around to it within 3-7 days instead of 1 or 2, but to preserve my high ranking I am more than willing to wait.</p>
<p>I added the xml sitemap on January 2, 2012 and on January 4, 2012 page 1 many rankings/keywords disappeared by the 5th only dropped further back I have since deleted the sitemaps from the web dirs and removed them from google web master tools.  </p>
<p>To find out more you can go check this out..<br />
<a HREF="http://www.computerz101.com/" rel="nofollow">Tucson Internet Marketing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=177#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>Buy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Louis Vuitton Replica Handbags&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; online here; there are many cheap LV Bags on sale. With Craftsmanship has been perfectly accomplished.If you never use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Louis Vuitton Replica&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, then you can start to have one at our online store. Every customer of us has wonderful bags.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Replica LV bags&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. In this world of fashion and consciousness, all the women around the globe are mad about the designer and matching handbags.They are sale cheap but high quality,louis vuitton bags are saling online use the best materials, so buy cheap lv bags here is your best choice.
Louis Vuitton Bags are not a marketing page, it&#039;s only a fan page just to exchange information between the user and Facebook.Sharing my shopping &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Louis Vuitton Bags&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Tips. An authentic Louis Vuitton handbag shouts luxury and status like no other.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Louis Vuitton Replica Handbags</b></a> online here; there are many cheap LV Bags on sale. With Craftsmanship has been perfectly accomplished.If you never use <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Louis Vuitton Replica</b></a>, then you can start to have one at our online store. Every customer of us has wonderful bags.<br />
<a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Replica LV bags</b></a>. In this world of fashion and consciousness, all the women around the globe are mad about the designer and matching handbags.They are sale cheap but high quality,louis vuitton bags are saling online use the best materials, so buy cheap lv bags here is your best choice.<br />
Louis Vuitton Bags are not a marketing page, it&#8217;s only a fan page just to exchange information between the user and Facebook.Sharing my shopping <a href="http://www.replicalouisvuittonhandbags2u.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Louis Vuitton Bags</b></a> Tips. An authentic Louis Vuitton handbag shouts luxury and status like no other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=177#comment-718</guid>
		<description>@ Larry,

Thanks for commenting!  I like your way of thinking - anything worth doing is worth doing correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Larry,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!  I like your way of thinking &#8211; anything worth doing is worth doing correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/my-favorite-seo-argument-sitemap-vs-no-sitemap/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=177#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Like with all development, the key is not the tools you use but how you use them.  Sitemaps are a great tool if you code properly.  If you do not follow good coding techniques then no tools will help you.

I hear the same argument about vb.net vs. c#.net.  I&#039;m proficient in both but I prefer vb as it&#039;s easier to work with and actually I find it LESS verbose than c#, contrary to the literature out there.  The arguments against vb amount to the fact that it&#039;s easier to code poorly.  So, don&#039;t code poorly!

I always find my rankings go up after resubmitting my sitemap.  I know my sitemap is not the only reason I get consistently high hits however.  It&#039;s just a matter of doing everything correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like with all development, the key is not the tools you use but how you use them.  Sitemaps are a great tool if you code properly.  If you do not follow good coding techniques then no tools will help you.</p>
<p>I hear the same argument about vb.net vs. c#.net.  I&#8217;m proficient in both but I prefer vb as it&#8217;s easier to work with and actually I find it LESS verbose than c#, contrary to the literature out there.  The arguments against vb amount to the fact that it&#8217;s easier to code poorly.  So, don&#8217;t code poorly!</p>
<p>I always find my rankings go up after resubmitting my sitemap.  I know my sitemap is not the only reason I get consistently high hits however.  It&#8217;s just a matter of doing everything correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

