<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Vs Flash Vs SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoboy.com/apple-vs-flash-vs-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoboy.com/apple-vs-flash-vs-seo/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Search Engine Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Publish a Book of Blues. Hopefully (or Finn :-) )</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/apple-vs-flash-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Publish a Book of Blues. Hopefully (or Finn :-) )</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=2791#comment-2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the thought of using a static image behind the flash so apple products can see something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the thought of using a static image behind the flash so apple products can see something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott S.</title>
		<link>http://www.seoboy.com/apple-vs-flash-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoboy.com/?p=2791#comment-2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good read - going back about 10 years I remember when Flash was thought to be &quot;the future of the web&quot;.  

Fast-forward to today it is very clear Flash can deliver some very interesting elements to user experience ... but clearly has drawbacks for multiple reasons.  Seems proprietary development is taking a beating when it comes to the internet now.

It will be interesting to see how thorough and how quick HTML 5 will perform in comparison to Flash.  If HTML 5 can pull off everything Flash can do with minimal issue this could very well be the beginning of the end for Flash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read &#8211; going back about 10 years I remember when Flash was thought to be &#8220;the future of the web&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Fast-forward to today it is very clear Flash can deliver some very interesting elements to user experience &#8230; but clearly has drawbacks for multiple reasons.  Seems proprietary development is taking a beating when it comes to the internet now.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how thorough and how quick HTML 5 will perform in comparison to Flash.  If HTML 5 can pull off everything Flash can do with minimal issue this could very well be the beginning of the end for Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
